PERAC Memo #25 - 2000: Regular Compensation status of payments for unused vacation and personal days
Regular Compensation status of payments for unused vacation and personal days
View original on MA State Library →Summary
PERAC Memo #25/2000 clarifies that payments for unused vacation and personal days may be classified as regular compensation if they are regular, recurring, and made under a written policy or collective bargaining agreement, are based on days actually earned in the year of purchase (excluding sick days), are not tied to retirement notice, are available non-discriminatorily, and are reasonable in amount so as not to burden the system. Boards are required to review all relevant employer policies and contracts to determine, on a prospective basis only, whether such payments meet these criteria for treatment as regular compensation.
Full Text
PERAC MEMO #25/2000 M E M O R A N D U M TO: All Retirement Boards FROM: Joseph E. Connarton, Executive Director RE: Regular Compensation status of payments for unused vacation and personal days DATE: June 8, 2000 The Commission has recently reviewed the regular compensation status of employer payments for unused vacation and personal days and its interpretation of 840 CMR 15.03(2)(d). The Commission has decided that retirement boards can determine that payments for unused vacation and personal days may be classified as regular compensation in accordance with the following criterion: • The payments must be regular and recurring and pursuant to an official, written policy of the employer or a collectively bargained contract. • Payments must only be for unused vacation days or personal days actually earned in the year of the purchase. Payments can not be for unused sick days since use of sick days is conditioned on not being able to attend work while vacation and personal days can generally be taken at the option of the employee. • Payments can not be made as a result of giving notice of retirement. • Payments must be available on a non-discriminatory basis, although service minimums and accumulated leave minimums may be a condition of receipt of payments in accordance with the policy or contract. • Payments must be in a reasonable amount and, in the aggregate, not in an amount which would cause a substantial financial burden on the retirement system. The Supreme Judicial Court in the case of Boston School Administrators ruled that regular compensation “refers to remuneration geared to work or services performed.” Boston Association of School Administrators et al. v. Boston Retirement Board et al., 383 Mass. 336, 341 (1981). Payments for unused vacation and personal days by policy or contract in a reasonable amount meet that definition. The Appeals Court, in Zelesky v. Commissioner of the Division of PERA, ruled that the statutory definition of regular compensation is intended to prevent “the introduction of ad hoc payments M E M O R A N D U M - Page Two TO: All Retirement Boards FROM: Joseph E. Connarton, Executive Director RE: Regular Compensation status of payments for unused vacation and personal days DATE: June 9, 2000 into the calculation of pension allowances and ensure a minimum level of predictability in computing pension payments made out of the retirement system.” 30 Mass. App. Ct. 106, 109 (1990). Payments which, in the aggregate, do not have a large effect on the retirement system meet the requirement of Zelesky. Retirement boards should review all policies and contracts of the governmental units covered by the retirement system to determine if the payments for unused vacation and personal days allowed in those policies and contracts are regular compensation. This determination should only be made on a prospective basis. We trust the foregoing is of assistance. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact this office.