PERAC Memo #28 - 1998: COLA
COLA
View original on MA State Library →Summary
This memo clarifies that accepting Section 103 (COLA statute) does not itself grant a FY99 COLA—boards must separately and formally vote to grant the COLA after acceptance is complete, with that vote occurring on or before June 30 and board minutes forwarded to PERAC. It also relays a State Ethics Commission opinion permitting retired board members to participate in both the Section 103 acceptance vote and the annual COLA determination, despite their financial interest, though this exception applies only to these specific COLA-related votes.
Full Text
PERAC MEMO #28/1998 M E M O R A N D U M TO:All Retirement Boards FROM:Robert F. Stalnaker, Executive Director RE:COLA DATE:June 22, 1998 PERAC has provided notice to the retirement boards of the actions that must be taken to accept the COLA statute on several occasions. I would like to stress that acceptance of Section 103 of Chapter 32 by the retirement board and the local “legislative body” does not result in a COLA in FY99 for retirees. The retirement board must separately and formally vote to grant a FY99 COLA after Section 103 has been fully accepted and must do so on or before June 30. A copy of the board minutes reflecting that vote should be forwarded to PERAC. In response to an inquiry from a retired member serving on a retirement board, the State Ethics Commission has issued an opinion regarding board member participation in the COLA decision- making process. The opinion states that it is permissible for a retired member to participate in the decision of a retirement board to accept section 103 of Chapter 32 and it is also permissible for a retired member to participate in the annual determination by the retirement board with respect to the COLA. The Ethics Commission noted that, although Chapter 268A, section 6 precludes such participation, in order to give meaning to the COLA statute, the Legislature, in adopting that statute, must have intended to permit participation in spite of the retired member’s financial interest. It should be stressed that this opinion applies only in these circumstances and does not pertain to retirement board action in other circumstances.